Anthony Kelly v. Mathew Baker
Anthony Kelly v. Mathew Baker
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6666
ANTHONY QUENTIN KELLY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MATHEW G. BAKER; SERGEANT WILLIAM L. THOMAS; WARDEN FRANK B. BISHOP, JR.; STATE OF MARYLAND,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:17-cv-01433-RDB)
Submitted: October 25, 2018 Decided: November 1, 2018
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Quentin Kelly, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Anthony Quentin Kelly appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2012) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Kelly v. Baker, No. 1:17-cv-01433-RDB (D. Md. May 15
& 29, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished