United States v. Jerome Satterfield
United States v. Jerome Satterfield
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6672
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JEROME FREDERICK SATTERFIELD,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, Chief District Judge. (1:99-cr-00131-TDS-1)
Submitted: October 26, 2018 Decided: November 15, 2018
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerome Frederick Satterfield, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Jerome Frederick Satterfield appeals from the district court’s order granting his
motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012), but denying
his request to have his federal sentence run concurrently to his state sentence. We have
reviewed the court’s order de novo and find no error. United States v. Peters,
843 F.3d 572, 577(4th Cir. 2016), cert. denied,
137 S. Ct. 2267(2017) (stating standard of
review). We therefore affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished