Janice Grenadier v. Rebecca Smith
Janice Grenadier v. Rebecca Smith
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1633
JANICE WOLK GRENADIER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
REBECCA BEACH SMITH, Chief Judge Honorable; LEONIE M. BRINKEMA, Judge; GERALD BRUCE LEE, Judge; LIAM O’GRADY, Judge; ANTHONY J. TRENGA, Judge; JAMES C. CACHERIS, Senior Judge; CLAUDE M. HILTON, Senior Judge; T.S. ELLIS, III, Senior Judge; THERESA C. BUCHANAN, Magistrate Judge; JOHN F. ANDERSON, Magistrate Judge; IVAN D. DAVIS, Magistrate Judge; MICHAEL NACHMANOFF, Magistrate Judge; T. RAWLES JONES, JR., Magistrate Judge; ROGER L. GREGORY, Chief Judge; J. HARVIE WILKINSON, III, Judge; PAUL V. NIEMEYER, Judge; DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Judge; WILLIAM B. TRAXLER, JR., Judge; ROBERT B. KING, Judge; DENNIS W. SHEDD, Judge; ALLYSON K. DUNCAN, Judge; G. STEVEN AGEE, Judge; BARBARA MILANO KEENAN, Judge; JAMES A WYNN, JR., Judge; ALBERT DIAZ, Judge; HENRY F. FLOYD, Judge; STEPHANIE D. THACKER, Judge; PAMELA A. HARRIS, Judge; CLYDE H. HAMILTON, Senior Judge; ANDRE M. DAVIS, Senior Judge; BERYL A. HOWELL, Chief Judge; EMMET G. SULLIVAN, District Judge; JAMES E. BOASBERG, District Judge; AMY BERMAN JACKSON, District Judge; RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, District Judge; ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Senior Judge; ELLEN S. HUVELLE, Senior Judge; REGGIE B. WALTON, Senior Judge; RICHARD J. LEON, Senior Judge; ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, Senior Judge; MERRICK B. GARLAND, Chief Judge; BRIAN KENNEY, Judge; STEPHEN MITCHELL, Judge; JANE/JOHN DOES, 1-100; Defendants all Public Servants, individually and in his or her official capacity as a Federal Judge an Officer of the Court,
Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Henry E. Hudson, Senior District Judge. (1:17-cv-01106-HEH)
Submitted: November 7, 2018 Decided: November 21, 2018
Before RICHARDSON and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges. *
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Janice Wolk Grenadier, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
* This opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 46(d) (2012).
2 PER CURIAM:
Janice Wolk Grenadier appeals the district court’s order denying her
post-judgment motions. We have reviewed the record and agree with the district court
that it lacked the authority to grant the requested relief. Accordingly, we affirm. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
3
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished