U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2018

In re: Jamel Law

In re: Jamel Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 3, 2018

In re: Jamel Law

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-1879

In re: JAMEL LAW, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:10-cr-00477-CMH-2)

Submitted: November 29, 2018 Decided: December 3, 2018

Before DUNCAN and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jamel Law, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Jamel Law petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion for a sentence reduction. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court ruled on Law’s motion for sentence reduction. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Law’s motion, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.