United States v. Timothy Massey
United States v. Timothy Massey
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6939
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TIMOTHY L. MASSEY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:13-cr-00224-MOC-1; 3:16-cv- 00244-MOC)
Submitted: December 20, 2018 Decided: December 27, 2018
Before DIAZ and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timothy L. Massey, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Timothy L. Massey appeals the district court’s order construing his Fed. R. Civ. P.
60(b) motion as an unauthorized successive
28 U.S.C. § 2255(2012) motion and
dismissing for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we deny as unnecessary a certificate of appealability (“COA”) and
affirm. See United States v. McRae,
793 F.3d 392, 400(4th Cir. 2015) (“[W]e need not
issue a COA before determining whether the district court erred in dismissing [a]
purported Rule 60(b) motion as an unauthorized successive habeas petition.”). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished