UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-7263

THOMAS T. DILLARD, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

FRANK PERRY; W. DAVID GUICE; GEORGE SOLOMON; PAULA Y. SMITH; MARSHALL PIKE; JASMINE T. BELYEW; JONNITA BAKER; HOWARD BELK; A. BARNES; LITONYA CARTER; GAIL BIEBER; WARDEN JOYNER; S. WHITE; MIKE BALL; MIKE SLAGLE; CYNTHIA THORNTON; THOMAS ASBELL; SHEILA GREENE; ASST. SUPERINTENDENT TOMLINSON; K. DALRYMPLE; JASON PENLAND; LAUREN HARRELL; D. GIBBS; C. HERNANDEZ; PAULA PAGE; DAVID MAY; CLAUDIA JONES; TIM JONES; J. DRIGGERS; PROGRAM SUPERVISOR BUCHANAN; G. GARNER; UNIT MANAGER CROWE; ASST. UNIT MANAGER GREEN; F. SPEER; NURSE PITTMAN; NURSE MELTON; HOPE SMITH; DOCTOR UMESI; FRANCESCA SHON; NURSE WOLFE; NURSE BUCHANAN; RASHIA L. NORMAN; SCARLETT R. ASWELL; CRISSY H. SMITH; P. G. CHRISAWN; P. KIRBY; CASE MANAGER NIVENS; B. LIDE; L. NORRIS; CASE MANAGER HUGHES; J. G. DUCKWORTH; TRANSFER COORDINATOR RUDISILL; J. CANNON; CARRIE TUCKER; GARY JUNKER; KRISTIE STANBACK; JEFFREY FIELDS; G. CRUTCHFIELD; PROGRAM SUPERVISOR STEWART; T. LOCKAMY; DR. LIGHTSEY; T. DEAL; K. FAIRLEY; NURSE GIL; GEORGIA BRYANT; SERGEANT WEBB; NURSE GARNER; NICOLE SPRUELL; ERIK A. HOOKS; JOHN/JANE DOE, Pharmacy Supervisor; JOHN/JANE DOE, Medical Supervisor; JOHN/JANE DOE, Case Manager; JOHN/JANE DOE, Social Worker; JOHN/JANE DOE, Nurse,

Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:17-ct-03119-D)

Submitted: January 17, 2019 Decided: January 23, 2019

Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas T. Dillard, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Thomas T. Dillard, Jr. appeals the district court’s orders accepting the

recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his

(2012)

complaint and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Dillard v. Perry, No. 5:17-ct-03119-D (E.D.N.C. Oct. 2, 2017 & Aug. 10, 2018). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

3