U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2019

Susan Matousek v. Christian Psychotherapy

Susan Matousek v. Christian Psychotherapy
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 24, 2019

Susan Matousek v. Christian Psychotherapy

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-2430

SUSAN NEAL MATOUSEK, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHRISTIAN PSYCHOTHERAPY; JACKIE BUTLER; DR. HUFF, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:18-cv-00595-RAJ-LRL)

Submitted: January 22, 2019 Decided: January 24, 2019

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Susan Neal Matousek, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Susan Neal Matousek appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action for lack of jurisdiction. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Matousek’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Matousek has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.