Fredrick Herold, Jr. v. Merrill Lynch

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Fredrick Herold, Jr. v. Merrill Lynch

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-2050

FREDRICK W. HEROLD, JR., Individually, and Derivatively on behalf of Nominal Defendants of the Estate of Frederick William Herold, Julie A. Morrone, Allison P. Dickie, Kristin M. Larimore, and Jonathan D. Herold,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC.; BRADFORD E. BUGHER; THE ESTATE OF FREDRICK WILLIAM HEROLD, Nominal Defendant; JULIE A. MORRONE, Nominal Defendant; ALLISON P. DICKIE, Nominal Defendant; KRISTIN M. LARIMORE, Nominal Defendant; JONATHAN D. HEROLD, Nominal Defendant,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:18-cv-00449-JAG)

Submitted: January 22, 2019 Decided: January 24, 2019

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Fredrick W. Herold, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Fredrick W. Herold, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil

complaint under

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(e)(2)(B) (2012), and denying his motion under Fed. R.

Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Herold v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce,

Fenner & Smith, Inc., No. 3:18-cv-00449-JAG (E.D. Va. July 23 & Aug. 13, 2018). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished