United States v. Anna Holt
United States v. Anna Holt
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-7156
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ANNA B. HOLT, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, District Judge. (1:17-cr-00030-JPJ-PMS-1)
Submitted: January 30, 2019 Decided: February 7, 2019
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anna B. Holt, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Anna B. Holt appeals from the district court’s orders denying her motion to modify her restitution order and her motion for reconsideration. Our review of the record reveals that Holt is not challenging the district court’s restitution order, but rather she challenges a payment schedule under the Inmate Financial Responsibility Program. Such a claim must be brought in a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition after exhaustion of administrative remedies. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.