Tyrone Hurt v. Fifty (50) States
Tyrone Hurt v. Fifty (50) States
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-2314
TYRONE HURT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
FIFTY (50) STATES; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:18-cv-02916-RDB)
Submitted: February 21, 2019 Decided: February 25, 2019
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tyrone Hurt, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Tyrone Hurt appeals the district court’s order finding that the pleadings filed in
this case do not state a cognizable claim and, in accordance with a prefiling injunction,
ordering the case closed. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Hurt v. Fifty (50) States, No. 1:18-cv-02916-RDB (D. Md.
Sept. 24, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished