U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2019

United States v. Kenneth Nesmith

United States v. Kenneth Nesmith
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 26, 2019

United States v. Kenneth Nesmith

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-7479

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KENNETH MANTRELL NESMITH, a/k/a K-Wayne, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (4:13-cr-00843-RBH-6)

Submitted: February 21, 2019 Decided: February 26, 2019

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Mantrell Nesmith, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Dolan Taylor, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Kenneth Mantrell Nesmith appeals the district court’s order denying his pro se motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Nesmith, No. 4:13-cr-00843-RBH-6 (D.S.C. Nov. 27, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.