U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2019

Roderick Gatling-Bey v. Melissa Kennedy

Roderick Gatling-Bey v. Melissa Kennedy
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 26, 2019

Roderick Gatling-Bey v. Melissa Kennedy

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-7291

RODERICK DEMAIN GATLING-BEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MELISSA KENNEDY, Durham Police Department; NATE PARKER, Durham Police Department; TIM JOHNSON, Durham Police Department; J. CARL HUSKETH, Durham Police Department; J.J. CARTWRIGHT, Durham Police Department; SET TEAM, Durham Police Department; JEFFREY LUX; JAMES DORNFRIED, Durham County ADA; JUDGE KENNETH C. TITUS; ERIK A.

HOOKS; SUPERINTENDENT SAPPER, Bertie Correctional, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:18-ct-03043-D)

Submitted: February 21, 2019 Decided: February 26, 2019

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roderick Demain Gatling-Bey, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Roderick Demain Gatling-Bey appeals the district court’s order dismissing his § 1983 action as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a), (b) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Gatling-Bey’s motion to enforce subrogation rights and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gatling-Bey v. Kennedy, No. 5:18-ct-03043-D (E.D.N.C. Sept. 17, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.