U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2019

Bradford Metcalf v. S. Kallis

Bradford Metcalf v. S. Kallis
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 26, 2019

Bradford Metcalf v. S. Kallis

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-7260

BRADFORD METCALF, Petitioner - Appellant, v. S. KALLIS, Warden, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:17-cv-00121-GMG)

Submitted: February 21, 2019 Decided: February 26, 2019

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bradford Metcalf, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Bradford Metcalf, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Metcalf v. S. Kallis, No. 3:17-cv-00121-GMG (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 3, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.