Susan Matousek v. Planet Fitness

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Susan Matousek v. Planet Fitness

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-2429

SUSAN NEAL MATOUSEK,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

PLANET FITNESS; MR. GRIFFIN; MS. CHROMEN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:18-cv-00597-RAJ-LRL)

Submitted: February 26, 2019 Decided: February 28, 2019

Before KING, THACKER, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Susan Neal Matousek, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Susan Neal Matousek appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action

for improper venue and declining to transfer it to another district. On appeal, we confine

our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because

Matousek’s informal brief does not challenge the bases for the district court’s

dispositions, Matousek has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v.

Lightsey,

775 F.3d 170, 177

(4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important

document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that

brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished