U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2019

United States v. Paul Ewing

United States v. Paul Ewing
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 20, 2019

United States v. Paul Ewing

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-7365

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. PAUL ALONZO EWING, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:09-cr-00083-AWA-TEM-1)

Submitted: March 12, 2019 Decided: March 20, 2019

Before KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul Alonzo Ewing, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Paul Alonzo Ewing appeals the district court’s order construing his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(d)(3) motion as an unauthorized 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and denying it for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court, United States v. Ewing, No. 2:09-cr-00083-AWA-TEM-1 (E.D. Va. Sept. 17, 2018), but modify the order to reflect denial of Ewing’s motion without prejudice. We deny a certificate of appealability as unnecessary and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.