U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2019

Constance Pratt v. Retha Albriton

Constance Pratt v. Retha Albriton
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 10, 2019

Constance Pratt v. Retha Albriton

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-2231

CONSTANCE PRATT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RETHA ALBRITON, Pitt County Department of Social Services, Child Protection Division; SOFIA ELLIS, Pitt County Department of Social Services, Child Protection Division; KEISHA ADAMS; JANE DAWSON; MARGARET DIXON; LINDA MIZELLE, Defendants - Appellees, and PITT COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Child Protection Division, Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (4:16-cv-00198-BR)

Submitted: March 29, 2019 Decided: April 10, 2019

Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Constance Pratt, Appellant Pro Se. Scott Christopher Hart, SUMRELL, SUGG, CARMICHAEL, HICKS & HART, PA, New Bern, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Constance Pratt appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and granting summary judgment to Appellees in Pratt’s civil action.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pratt v. Albriton, No. 4:16-cv-00198-BR (E.D.N.C. Sept. 24, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.