United States v. Jack Vance

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Jack Vance

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-7304

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JACK EARL VANCE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (2:05-cr-00043-JPB-1)

Submitted: April 18, 2019 Decided: April 22, 2019

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jack Earl Vance, Appellant Pro Se. Traci Michelle Cook, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jack Earl Vance appeals the district court’s omnibus order denying the various

postjudgment motions Vance filed seeking, among other relief, the production of

evidence presented in his federal criminal proceedings and trial transcripts. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. See United States v. Vance, No. 2:05-cr-00043-JPB-1

(N.D.W. Va. Oct. 9, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished