U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2019

Justin Woodington v. Mrs. Goode

Justin Woodington v. Mrs. Goode
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 23, 2019

Justin Woodington v. Mrs. Goode

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-6126

JUSTIN PAUL WOODINGTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MRS. GOODE, Health Service Administrator; S. GREGORY, R.N., Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, Senior District Judge. (3:18-cv-00693-HEH-RCY)

Submitted: April 18, 2019 Decided: April 23, 2019

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Justin Paul Woodington, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Justin Paul Woodington appeals the district court’s dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint for failure to pay the initial filing fee or to apply to proceed in forma pauperis. * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Woodington v. Goode, No. 3:18-cv-00693-HEH-RCY (E.D. Va. Jan. 11, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Because the district court dismissed the complaint “for . . . reasons unrelated to the contents of the pleadings,” we have jurisdiction over this appeal. Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid. Soc’y, Inc. 807 F.3d 619, 624 (4th Cir. 2015).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.