In re: Momolu Sirleaf, Jr.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

In re: Momolu Sirleaf, Jr.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-2262

In re: MOMOLU V.S. SIRLEAF, Priest, Commonwealth of Israel,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (3:17-cv-00606-MHL-RCY)

Submitted: April 4, 2019 Decided: April 23, 2019

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Momolu V.S. Sirleaf, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Momolu V.S. Sirleaf petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court

has not filed certain motions in his case. He seeks an order from this court directing the

district court to file the motions. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the

district court has filed the motions. Accordingly, because the district court has acted in

Sirleaf’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in

forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished