U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2019

United States v. Eduardo Saenz

United States v. Eduardo Saenz
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 29, 2019

United States v. Eduardo Saenz

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-7484

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. EDUARDO SAENZ, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:07-cr-00195-RJC-1)

Submitted: April 25, 2019 Decided: April 29, 2019

Before FLOYD and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eduardo Saenz, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Eduardo Saenz appeals the district court’s order denying his “Motion for Judicial Notice Pursuant to Rule 201.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Saenz, No. 3:07-cr-00195-RJC-1 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 29. 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.