United States v. Timothy Murphy
United States v. Timothy Murphy
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-6154
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TIMOTHY LAFON MURPHY, a/k/a TJ, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:04-cr-00241-FL-1)
Submitted: April 25, 2019 Decided: April 30, 2019
Before FLOYD and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timothy Lafon Murphy, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Timothy Lafon Murphy appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion seeking sentence reduction based on Amendment 750 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Murphy, No. 5:04-cr-00241-FL-1 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 3, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.