U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2019

In re: Franklin Smith

In re: Franklin Smith
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 3, 2019

In re: Franklin Smith

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-1006

In re: FRANKLIN C. SMITH, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (2:18-cv-00397-MSD-LRL)

Submitted: April 29, 2019 Decided: May 3, 2019

Before AGEE and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Franklin C. Smith, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Franklin C. Smith petitions for a writ of mandamus, seeking an order compelling “Robert Mueller and all his independent (F.B.I.) offices across the United States to place an immediate halt on all the State and Federal Informant Systems.” He also seeks a list of all informants operating in Virginia Beach, Virginia on August 23 to August 24, 2016.

Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v. Moussaoui, 333 F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further, mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought, and the respondent has a has a clear duty to perform the requested act. Cumberland Cty. Hosp. Sys., Inc. v. Burwell, 816 F.3d 48, 52 (4th Cir. 2016).

The relief sought by Smith is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.