U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2019

William Dixon v. Kristi Cortez

William Dixon v. Kristi Cortez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 9, 2019

William Dixon v. Kristi Cortez

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6486

WILLIAM K. DIXON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. KRISTI CORTEZ, RN; KRISTA BILAK, RNP; MULUGETA AKAL, M.D.; WARDEN FRANK BISHOP, JR., Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.

Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:17-cv-00503-TDC)

Submitted: April 22, 2019 Decided: May 9, 2019

Before WILKINSON, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William K. Dixon, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Conrad Meister, Gina Marie Smith, MEYERS, RODBELL & ROSENBAUM, PA, Riverdale Park, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: William K. Dixon appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Dixon v. Cortez, No. 8:17-cv-00503-TDC (D. Md. Mar. 22, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.