U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2019

Clarence Reynolds v. State of Virginia

Clarence Reynolds v. State of Virginia
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 21, 2019

Clarence Reynolds v. State of Virginia

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-6311

CLARENCE DUKE REYNOLDS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STATE OF VIRGINIA; ADRIANNE BENNETT, Chairwoman of Parole Board; REVERAND A. LINCOLN JAMES, Member of Parole Board; SHERMAN LEA, Member of Parole Board; JEAN W. CUNNINGHAM, Member of Parole Board; JONI L. IVEY, Member of Parole Board; RALPH S. NORTHAM, Governor, State of Virginia; THE SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVE OF VIRGINIA, Defendants - Appellees, and TERRY MCAULIFFE, Former Governor; State of Virginia; PAROLE BOARD MEMBERS; GOVERNOR, Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:17-cv-00517-JLK-JCH)

Submitted: May 16, 2019 Decided: May 21, 2019

Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clarence Duke Reynolds, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Clarence Duke Reynolds appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Reynolds v. Virginia, No. 7:17-cv-00517-JLK-JCH (W.D. Va. Feb. 19, 2019). We deny Reynolds’ motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.