U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2019

Alberto Ceja-Vargas v. M. Breckon

Alberto Ceja-Vargas v. M. Breckon
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 21, 2019

Alberto Ceja-Vargas v. M. Breckon

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-6121

ALBERTO CEJA-VARGAS, Petitioner - Appellant, v. M. BRECKON, Warden, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Elizabeth Kay Dillon, District Judge. (7:18-cv-00022-EKD-RSB)

Submitted: May 16, 2019 Decided: May 21, 2019

Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alberto Ceja-Vargas, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Alberto Ceja-Vargas, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order granting Respondent’s motion for summary judgment on Ceja-Vargas’ 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Ceja-Vargas leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ceja-Vargas v. Breckon, No. 7:18-cv-00022- EKD-RSB (W.D. Va. Jan. 2, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.