U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2019

Olandio Workman v. Metro PCS Mobile Phone Company

Olandio Workman v. Metro PCS Mobile Phone Company
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 29, 2019

Olandio Workman v. Metro PCS Mobile Phone Company

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-6085

OLANDIO RAY WORKMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. METRO PCS MOBILE PHONE COMPANY; MR. RICHARDSON; MR. LEWIS, Greenville County Sheriff’s Office; GREENVILLE COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. R. Bryan Harwell, Chief District Judge. (6:17-cv-01208-RBH)

Submitted: May 23, 2019 Decided: May 29, 2019

Before KING and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Olandio Ray Workman, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Olandio Ray Workman appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny Workman’s motions to amend and to stay the appeal and we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Workman v. Metro PCS Mobile Phone Co., No. 6:17-cv-01208-RBH (D.S.C. July 17, 2018 & Dec. 27, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.