Andre Stephens v. Unknown
Andre Stephens v. Unknown
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-6272
ANDRE STEPHENS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNKNOWN, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:19-cv-00152-LMB-MSN)
Submitted: May 23, 2019 Decided: May 29, 2019
Before KING and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Andre Stephen, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Andre Stephens appeals the district court’s order dismissing Stephen’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice under Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971).
On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Stephen’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Stephen has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order.
See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.