Darrell Williams v. Bryan Stirling
Darrell Williams v. Bryan Stirling
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-6322
DARRELL J. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BRYAN STIRLING; OFFICER WIGGINS; WARDEN RANDALL WILLIAMS, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (2:18-cv-01690-CMC- MGB)
Submitted: July 17, 2019 Decided: August 5, 2019
Before KING, HARRIS, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darrell J. Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Darrell J. Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order affirming the magistrate judge’s denial of Williams’ motions to subpoena expert witnesses and to compel discovery. He also seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying his motions to compel discovery and inspection and his motion for relief from judgment.
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The orders Williams seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Williams’ motion to suspend proceedings and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.