In Re: Richelle Wallace
In Re: Richelle Wallace
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-1206
In re: RICHELLE D. WALLACE, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (2:15-cv-00126-AWA-LRL)
Submitted: July 30, 2019 Decided: August 20, 2019
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, AGEE, Circuit Judge, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richelle D. Wallace, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Richelle D. Wallace petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on the appropriate amount of attorney’s fees in her civil case.
She seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.