U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2019

Momolu Sirleaf v. Andrew McCabe

Momolu Sirleaf v. Andrew McCabe
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 21, 2019

Momolu Sirleaf v. Andrew McCabe

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-6423

PRIEST MOMOLU V.S. SIRLEAF, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ANDREW MCCABE; ROD ROSENSTEIN; ADAM SCHIFF; U.S., Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James P. Jones, District Judge. (7:19-cv-00240-JPJ-PMS)

Submitted: August 12, 2019 Decided: August 21, 2019

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Momolu V.S. Sirleaf, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Momolu V.S. Sirleaf, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil rights action as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sirleaf v. McCabe, No. 7:19-cv-00240-JPJ-PMS (W.D. Va. Mar. 18, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.