U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2019

Timothy Hankins, Sr. v. State

Timothy Hankins, Sr. v. State
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 26, 2019

Timothy Hankins, Sr. v. State

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-1520

TIMOTHY OMAR HANKINS, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; MARY JEAN GURGANUS; CHAD AXFORD; JENNIFER SMITH ECHOLS; KATHLEEN MURPHY; JOHN M.

OLIVER; SARDIA MARIE HANKINS, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (7:18-cv-00037-D)

Submitted: August 22, 2019 Decided: August 26, 2019

Before KING and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy Omar Hankins, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Timothy Omar Hankins, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reopen his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action and denying his request for mandamus relief. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hankins v. North Carolina, No. 7:18-cv- 00037-D (E.D.N.C. May 8, 2019). We deny Hankins’ motion to recuse any judge who has been admitted to the North Carolina bar. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.