U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2019

In re: Allen Dyer

In re: Allen Dyer
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 5, 2019

In re: Allen Dyer

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-1163

In re: ALLEN RAY DYER, Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.

James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (1:18-mc-00237)

Submitted: August 13, 2019 Decided: September 5, 2019

Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Allen Ray Dyer, LAW OFFICE OF ALLEN DYER, Ellicott City, Maryland, for Appellant.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Allen Ray Dyer appeals the district court’s order entering a public reprimand after Dyer was disciplined by the Court of Appeals of Maryland. We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing reciprocal discipline. See In re Morrissey, 305 F.3d 211, 217 (4th Cir. 2002); In re Fallin, 255 F.3d 195, 197 (4th Cir. 2001). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. In re Dyer, No. 1:18-mc-00237 (D. Md. Jan. 19, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.