U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2019

Chris Fordham v. Corrections Officer Manzola

Chris Fordham v. Corrections Officer Manzola
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 5, 2019

Chris Fordham v. Corrections Officer Manzola

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-6425

CHRIS FORDHAM, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CORRECTIONS OFFICER MANZOLA; CORRECTIONS OFFICER STEED; SERGEANT LEE LEWIS; W. FOX; MR. WILLIAMS; RN LEWIS; LPN AKUCHE; CORRECTIONS OFFICER THOMAS, Defendants - Appellees, and WARDEN BRANKER, Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (5:16-ct-03099-BO)

Submitted: August 20, 2019 Decided: September 5, 2019

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher James Fordham, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Christopher James Fordham appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fordham v. Manzola, No. 5:16-ct-03099- BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 13, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.