U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2019

Tinika Warren v. Josh Stein

Tinika Warren v. Josh Stein
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 26, 2019

Tinika Warren v. Josh Stein

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-1615

TINIKA S. WARREN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOSH STEIN, Attorney General; CITY OF GREENSBORO, Attorney Office; ELISE GREEN, Heir of Andrew Warren; TAKISHA WILSON, Heir of Andrew Warren; JEANETTE WARREN, Heir of Andrew Warren; ANDREW HEIRS, Heir of Andrew Warren; GUILFORD COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, Chief District Judge. (1:17-cv-01061-TDS-JLW)

Submitted: September 24, 2019 Decided: September 26, 2019

Before WYNN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tinika S. Warren, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Tinika S. Warren appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for settlement. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Warren v. Stein, No. 1:17-cv-01061 (M.D.N.C. May 10, 2019). We grant Warren’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny her motion to expedite, and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.