U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2019

Ronald McClary v. Michael Butler

Ronald McClary v. Michael Butler
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 1, 2019

Ronald McClary v. Michael Butler

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-6965

RONALD MCCLARY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MICHAEL BUTLER, Defendant - Appellee.

No. 19-7016

RONALD MCCLARY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MARTA KALINSKI, f/k/a Kalinski; CHRISTINA FOX, f/k/a Fox; CASSANDRA S. LOR, f/k/a Lor, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (5:19-cv-00016-MR; 5:18-cv-00102- MR)

Submitted: September 26, 2019 Decided: October 1, 2019 Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald McClary, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Ronald McClary seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motions for appointment of counsel. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.

Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The orders McClary seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.