Winifred Beasley v. Goodwin House Bailey's
Winifred Beasley v. Goodwin House Bailey's
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-1167
WINIFRED BEASLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GOODWIN HOUSE BAILEY’S CROSSROADS, Defendant - Appellee, and NATASHA CHESSNOE, Salon Manager; LORI SIMPSON, Director Senior Services; DANIELLE BROKENBURR, Human Resources; PAMELA CREWS, Salon Stylist, Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:18-cv-00837-LO-IDD)
Submitted: September 26, 2019 Decided: October 2, 2019
Before KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Winifred Beasley, Appellant Pro Se. Linda U. Okoukoni, Amanda Vaccaro, JACKSON LEWIS PC, Reston, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Winifred Beasley appeals the district court’s order granting Goodwin House Bailey’s Crossroads’ motion to dismiss Beasley’s claims that she was harassed, subjected to retaliation and a hostile work environment, and constructively discharged because of her race, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A.
§§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2012 & Supp. 2019). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Beasley v. Goodwin House Bailey’s Crossroads, No. 1:18-cv-00837-LO-IDD (E.D. Va. Jan. 15, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.