U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2019

Kinggobe Assegai, VII v. Andrew Saul

Kinggobe Assegai, VII v. Andrew Saul
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 8, 2019

Kinggobe Assegai, VII v. Andrew Saul

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-1580

KINGGOBE AFRICAN ASSEGAI, VII, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security Administration; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, Senior District Judge. (3:18-cv-00490-HEH)

Submitted: September 27, 2019 Decided: October 8, 2019

Before KING, FLOYD, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kinggobe African Assegai, VII, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Kinggobe African Assegai, VII, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and upholding the Administrative Law Judge’s denial of Assegai’s claim for additional retirement benefits. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Assegai v. Saul, No. 3:18-cv-00490-HEH (E.D. Va. May 14, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.