U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2019

United States v. Richard Fulton

United States v. Richard Fulton
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 6, 2019

United States v. Richard Fulton

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-6717

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. RICHARD L. FULTON, a/k/a Brandon B. Washington, a/k/a Kevin, a/k/a Kev, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. James P. Jones, District Judge. (5:01-cr-30075-JPJ-1)

Submitted: October 25, 2019 Decided: November 6, 2019

Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Juval O. Scott, Federal Public Defender, Lisa M. Lorish, Assistant Federal Public Defender, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellant. Thomas Cullen, United States Attorney, Kate Rumsey, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Richard L. Fulton appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Fulton v. United States, No. 5:01-cr-30075-JPJ-1 (W.D.Va. May 1, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.