U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2019

Dmitry Pronin v. Charles Wright

Dmitry Pronin v. Charles Wright
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 15, 2019

Dmitry Pronin v. Charles Wright

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-6780

DMITRY PRONIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHARLES WRIGHT, “Chuck”; NEAL URCH; L. BLACKWELL, Defendants - Appellees, and ASHLEY MCCANN, Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:16-cv-03635-HM)

Submitted: October 23, 2019 Decided: November 15, 2019

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dmitry Pronin, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Dmitry Pronin appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pronin v. Wright, No. 5:16-cv-03635-HMH (D.S.C. May 13, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.