R. Ceasar v. Capital One Bank

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

R. Ceasar v. Capital One Bank

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-1968

DR. R. CEASAR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CAPITAL ONE BANK, Headquarters; CAPITAL ONE, President/CEO,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, District Judge. (3:19-cv-00495-MHL)

Submitted: November 21, 2019 Decided: November 25, 2019

Before KEENAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

R. Ceasar, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

R. Ceasar appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint under

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ceasar v. Capital One

Bank, No. 3:19-cv-00495-MHL (E.D. Va. Aug. 26, 2019). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished