R. Ceasar v. Capital One Bank
R. Ceasar v. Capital One Bank
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-1968
DR. R. CEASAR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CAPITAL ONE BANK, Headquarters; CAPITAL ONE, President/CEO,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, District Judge. (3:19-cv-00495-MHL)
Submitted: November 21, 2019 Decided: November 25, 2019
Before KEENAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
R. Ceasar, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
R. Ceasar appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ceasar v. Capital One
Bank, No. 3:19-cv-00495-MHL (E.D. Va. Aug. 26, 2019). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished