R. Ceasar v. Capital One Bank
R. Ceasar v. Capital One Bank
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-1968
DR. R. CEASAR, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CAPITAL ONE BANK, Headquarters; CAPITAL ONE, President/CEO, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, District Judge. (3:19-cv-00495-MHL)
Submitted: November 21, 2019 Decided: November 25, 2019
Before KEENAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
R. Ceasar, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: R. Ceasar appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ceasar v. Capital One Bank, No. 3:19-cv-00495-MHL (E.D. Va. Aug. 26, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.