United States v. Kenneth Watford
United States v. Kenneth Watford
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-6868
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
KENNETH WAYNE WATFORD, a/k/a Abdul Abrams,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:12-cr-00623-PJM-3)
Submitted: November 21, 2019 Decided: November 26, 2019
Before KEENAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth Wayne Watford, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth G. Wright, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Kenneth Wayne Watford appeals the district court’s paperless order denying his
motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) to set aside the criminal judgment. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished