U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2019

Reco Miller v. Nyeemo Moore

Reco Miller v. Nyeemo Moore
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 26, 2019

Reco Miller v. Nyeemo Moore

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7059

RECO LAMONT MILLER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NYEEMO MOORE; MITCHELL ROBINSON, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence.

Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (4:19-cv-01552-BHH)

Submitted: November 21, 2019 Decided: November 26, 2019

Before KEENAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reco Lamont Miller, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Reco L. Miller appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). We review a district court’s dismissal under Rule 41(b) for abuse of discretion. Simpson v. Welch, 900 F.2d 33, 35-36 (4th Cir. 1990). We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Miller v. Moore, No. 4:19-cv-01552-BHH (D.S.C. July 2, 2019). We also deny Miller’s motion to appoint counsel.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.