United States v. Kareem Brown
United States v. Kareem Brown
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-7159
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
KAREEM BROWN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Mark S. Davis, Chief District Judge. (4:17-cr-00113-MSD-RJK-1)
Submitted: December 17, 2019 Decided: December 20, 2019
Before KING, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kareem Brown, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Kareem Brown appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for an extension
of time to appeal his criminal judgment. Upon review, we conclude that the district court
correctly determined that it was unable to extend the time for filing a timely notice of appeal
of the criminal judgment because Brown filed his motion after the expiration of the
excusable neglect period. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4). Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Brown, No. 4:17-cr-00113-MSD-RJK-
1 (E.D. Va. July 18, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished