United States v. Donald Rice

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Donald Rice

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7134

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DONALD TERRELL RICE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior District Judge. (7:99-cr-00902-MBS-1)

Submitted: December 17, 2019 Decided: December 20, 2019

Before KING, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donald Terrell Rice, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Burke Moorman, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Donald Terrell Rice appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for relief

under the First Step Act of 2018,

Pub. L. No. 115-391, 132

Stat. 5194. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. United States v. Rice, No. 7:99-cr-00902-MBS-1 (D.S.C. July 22, 2019).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished