United States v. Donald Rice
United States v. Donald Rice
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-7134
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DONALD TERRELL RICE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior District Judge. (7:99-cr-00902-MBS-1)
Submitted: December 17, 2019 Decided: December 20, 2019
Before KING, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donald Terrell Rice, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Burke Moorman, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Donald Terrell Rice appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for relief
under the First Step Act of 2018,
Pub. L. No. 115-391, 132Stat. 5194. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. United States v. Rice, No. 7:99-cr-00902-MBS-1 (D.S.C. July 22, 2019).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished