Bruce Winston v. Warden Holland

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Bruce Winston v. Warden Holland

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7193

BRUCE WINSTON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN HOLLAND; WARDEN MANSUKHANI,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:19-hc-02008-FL)

Submitted: December 17, 2019 Decided: December 20, 2019

Before KING, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bruce Dwayne Winston, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Bruce Winston, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his

28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2012) petition without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to

proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Winston

v. Holland, No. 5:19-hc-02008-FL (E.D.N.C. July 15, 2019). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished