Pakastan Gary v. Unknown
Pakastan Gary v. Unknown
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-7009
PAKASTAN GARY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNKNOWN,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Senior District Judge. (2:19-cv-00177-RBS-RJK)
Submitted: December 17, 2019 Decided: January 6, 2020
Before NIEMEYER, RICHARDSON, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Pakastan Algier Gary, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Pakastan Algier Gary appeals the district court’s order dismissing his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2012) complaint without prejudice for failure to comply with its prior order. See
Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). We review a district court’s dismissal under Rule 41(b) for abuse of
discretion. Ballard v. Carlson,
882 F.2d 93, 95(4th Cir. 1989). We have reviewed the
record and find no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Gary v. Unknown, No. 2:19-cv-00177-RBS-RJK (E.D. Va. June 20,
2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished