United States v. Jerry Springsteen
United States v. Jerry Springsteen
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-7695
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Petitioner - Appellee,
v.
JERRY SPRINGSTEEN,
Respondent - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (5:15-hc-02081-BR)
Submitted: January 21, 2020 Decided: January 24, 2020
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerry Springsteen, Appellant Pro Se. Genna Danelle Petre, Special Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Jerry Springsteen appeals the district court’s order denying his pro se motions for
relief. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Springsteen, No. 5:15-hc-
02081-BR (E.D.N.C. Oct. 28, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished