James McConnell v. Watauga County
James McConnell v. Watauga County
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-1666
JAMES EDWARD MCCONNELL; KIM MCCONNELL,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
WATAUGA COUNTY; DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES WATAUGA COUNTY; THOMAS HUGHES; JENNIFER SMITH; JESSICA WINEBARGER; CHAD SLAGLE; LEN D. HAGAMAN; WATAUGA COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; JASKA H. ROMINGER; WESTERN SURETY COMPANY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (5:17-cv-00195-MOC-DCK)
Submitted: January 13, 2020 Decided: January 24, 2020
Before WILKINSON and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William E. Moore, Jr., GRAY, LAYTON, KERSH, SOLOMON, FURR & SMITH, PA, Gastonia, North Carolina, for Appellants. Bradley O. Wood, WOMBLE BOND DICKINSON (US) LLP, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
James Edward McConnell and Kim McConnell appeal from the district court’s
order granting summary judgment in favor of the Defendants on their civil action asserting
claims under
42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 and 1986 (2018), and related state-law claims arising
from the arrest and prosecution of James McConnell on state criminal charges of which he
was later acquitted. The McConnells also appeal the district court’s order affirming the
magistrate judge’s order denying their motion to compel and granting one of the
defendant’s motion for a protective order. We have reviewed the record included on
appeal, as well as the parties’ briefs, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McConnell v. Watauga Cty., No. 5:17-
cv-00195-MOC-DCK (W.D.N.C. May 9, 2019; May 31, 2019). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished