United States v. Shapat Nabaya
United States v. Shapat Nabaya
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-7302
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. SHAPAT AHDAWAN NABAYA, a/k/a Norman Abbott, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, District Judge. (3:17-cr-00003-MHL-1)
Submitted: January 23, 2020 Decided: January 28, 2020
Before WYNN, DIAZ, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Shapat Ahdawan Nabaya, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Shapat Ahdawan Nabaya appeals from the district court’s order denying seven postjudgment motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Nabaya, No. 3:17-cr-00003-MHL-1 (E.D. Va. Aug. 9, 2019). We deny Nabaya’s motion for release on bail and deny as unnecessary his motion for a certificate of appealability. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.